Friday, March 17, 2017

March 2017 Edition - PDF

Click on the link below to access the entire March 2017 Edition as one pdf.

Pundit - March 2017

Monday, March 13, 2017

Muskegon County's Holistic Approach to Child Support is Becoming a National Model

By Jane Hess
MSC Public Information Office

Muskegon County’s creative and collaborative approach to administering child support has other states taking notice.

In 2012, Muskegon’s prosecuting attorney and chief judge determined that the public in Muskegon County would be better served by having their offices combine resources to provide in one location the services that were formerly provided separately.  

Justice on a Planet with No Atmosphere

Imagine you are on a planet with no atmosphere.  Much like our moon there may be great mountains, stunning vistas, sweeping plains, and more beauty than you could ever imagine.  But with no atmosphere, you cannot experience it to the fullest because you are forced to wear a protective space suit. 

Sometimes courts can come across the same way.  Court processes and services are designed to deliver fair and just results, but sometimes, they end up depriving court users of a true sense of what they are going through.

The Hague Convention and What it Means For the Child Support Program

Why do I keep hearing about this convention?
In early 2007, the Hague Conference on Private International Law called for a convention to improve cooperation between countries to effectively recover international child support and other family maintenance. In November of 2007, The Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance (“the Convention”) released a list of recommendations and a uniform law for participating countries, all aimed at the collection and disbursement of international child support. The Convention was signed by all participating parties, including the United States (US); however, this would not be effective until further action was taken by the US Senate.

The Importance of Screening Friend of the Court Cases for Domestic Abuse

No Friend of the Court office (FOC) can adequately anticipate when violent acts will occur. However, identifying domestic abuse early in a case allows the FOC to take proper precautions to promote the safety of the parties, their children, and court personnel. In addition, identifying domestic abuse early in a case allows the FOC to gather information about the parties’ circumstances that is needed to provide a sound factual basis for judges and referees who must issue orders governing the parties.  
How common is domestic abuse in the state of Michigan? According to the Michigan Incident Crime Reporting (MICR) statistics for 2009 (the most recent year with completed data), there were 103,331 offenses of domestic abuse reported to law enforcement.

Weaver v. Giffels – Case Summary and Impact On FOCs

Although child support obligations generally end when a child reaches the age of eighteen, there are limited circumstances where the court may make an exception. If the child reaches 18, but is attending high school full-time and residing on a full-time basis with the child support recipient, the support obligation may continue. In the recent State of Michigan Court of Appeals case, Weaver v. Giffels, the court decided that “residing on a full-time basis with the child support recipient” means the child must physically live at the residence of the child support recipient and intend to make that place the child’s permanent residence. Ultimately, the case was returned to the trial court to determine whether the child resided with her mother full-time.

Legal Corner - March 2017

MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS
Weaver v. Giffels, opinion of the Court of Appeals, released November 10, 2016. (Docket No. 327844). In determing whether a child is residing with a parent on a full-time basis for the purpose of contining child support, the custody and parenting time order is irrelevant because the order no longer applies to an 18-year-old; rather, full-time basis refers to the child’s physical presence at the child support recipient’s residence combined with the child’s intent to reside there permanently.